A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.
Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.
Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.
In the wake of OpenAI’s countersuit against Elon Musk, Sam Altman’s company has sent a flurry of subpoenas to nonprofits asking for information about their funding sources, among other things. Is this a pro forma byproduct of their legal battle with Musk—or an intimidation tactic?
Join Puck to listen to this article
Over the weekend, Nathan Calvin, the general counsel for A.I. safety nonprofit Encode, accused OpenAI of engaging in legal intimidation tactics in a viral post on X. He detailed a nerve-racking experience, in early August, during which OpenAI served him two subpoenas: the first addressed to Encode, and the second addressed to him directly.
Sign up today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, A.I., Hollywood, and more.
Already a member? Log In
Exclusive to Inner Circle only
Enter your email for a free preview of Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.
You have 1 free article Left
To read this full story and more, start your 14 day free trial today →
Already a member? Log In
Enter your email to get access to one article and free previews of our private emails from Puck authors and editors.
Already a Member? Sign in
All of the insider knowledge from our top tier authors, in your inbox.
Already a member? Log In
You should receive a link to log in at .
You should receive a link to log in at .
Member Exclusive
Create a free account to preview Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.
Already a member? Sign in
You are logged into a free account as unknown@example.com
ENJOY 1 FREE ARTICLE EACH MONTH
Subscribe today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, A.I., Hollywood, and more.