Greetings from Los Angeles and welcome back to In the Room. Now that the F.C.C. has
finally approved the Paramount-Skydance merger, setting the stage for $PSKY to start trading after August 7, David Ellison, Jeff Shell, and George Cheeks can finally get to work implementing a plan they’ve had nearly a year to draft. In tonight’s issue, an exploration of the fallout from this week’s news, and the hopes and anxieties inside Paramount—and CBS News—as the new administration prepares to take
office.
🍸 Plus, on the latest edition of The Grill Room, Julia Alexander and I chew over the media industry’s latest soap operas: South Park’s satirical take on Trump and Paramount, the unfolding legal battle between Trump and Rupert Murdoch, Bari Weiss’s $200 million+ valuation erogenous zone for The Free Press, those erroneous Bezos-CNBC acquisition murmurs, and much
more. Follow The Grill Room on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you prefer to listen.
Also mentioned in this issue:
Brendan Carr, Olivia Trusty, Shari Redstone, Bill Owens, Stephen Colbert, Larry Ellison, Bob Iger, Jon Stewart, David Rhodes, Jimmy Pitaro, Anna Wintour, and many, many, more…
Let’s get started…
|
-
Another Post mortem: Politico has compiled a three-page list of the 100 or so journalists who have left The Washington Post since November, putting the talent drain under C.E.O. Will Lewis into sharp relief: Matea Gold
(to the Times), Phil Rucker (to CNN), Josh Dawsey (to the Journal), etcetera, along with myriad others who made quieter contributions to the paper. Of course, it also includes folks whom Will was presumably happy to see leave—indeed, he strongly encouraged critics of his strategy to take a buyout—but even the most charitable interpretation of his transformation effort must acknowledge that he absolutely shit the bed on talent
retention. Anyway, hat tip to the Times’s Ben Mullin for flagging this. Ben also noted, wryly, that while this diaspora found homes across the familiar legacy media institutions, not one of these 100-some journalists made their way to Politico.
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
TASTEMAKER’S CHOICE The Range Rover is a serene, elegant expression of modern luxury. EXPLORE
|
|
|
Now, here’s John Ourand on the ESPN-NFL deal…
|
|
|
| John Ourand
|
|
- Two years ago, ESPN
chairman Jimmy Pitaro started reaching out to other network heads to discuss ESPN’s direct-to-consumer service, which is launching this fall. To ensure the app’s success, and draw the most subscribers, ESPN brass believed they needed more than just the sports content that the network, itself, provided. Pitaro’s plan was simple, as you know: He wanted the service to be a sports hub. If a subscriber to the ESPN app wanted to watch, say, Fox’s production of the World Series, they’d
be able to add a Fox Sports–branded stream for $10 or $20 per month, without leaving the app.
Many other networks actually liked Pitaro’s pitch for how ESPN could supplement their streaming strategies, and offer sports fans one single place to see all the networks’ games. It seemed to be a solid step toward The Great Rebundling. What the network heads didn’t like, of course, was the idea of giving ESPN—which competes with them for viewers and sports rights—so much power
over their content. And they sure didn’t like the idea of training fans to go to an ESPN-branded service for all that expensive content. Who knows (or cares) whether a Red Sox–Phillies game is on Fox or TBS if fans can access it through ESPN? The rival networks were also unwilling to give ESPN access to all their audience data, information that would advantage ESPN during rights negotiations. Maybe there are deals to be had once the service becomes established, but none of the networks were
willing to gamble on a streaming strategy for an ESPN-branded service that hadn’t even launched yet. Anyway, all this dissent led to the aborted creation of Venu, a tortured and legally challenged joint venture between Disney, Fox, and Warner Bros. Discovery.
But the rise and fall of Venu didn’t stop Pitaro from pushing his forthcoming service, somewhat quixotically, as a sports hub. For the past few years, ESPN has been involved in on-again, off-again conversations with the NFL,
which has been looking for solutions for its NFL Network, whose fortunes have risen and fallen with the cable business as a whole. But ESPN brass was interested in more than NFL Network and its seven live games per season: Pitaro also wanted NFL RedZone, which would help realize his sports hub fantasies by offering subscribers live look-ins to games every Sunday.
My sources tell me that an NFL-ESPN deal, which has been in the works in one form or another for ages, is finally
coming to fruition, and could be completed before kickoff. The NFL is expected to take around a 10 percent stake in ESPN, with ESPN receiving total control over NFL Network and NFL RedZone, per CNBC. An ownership stake in the country’s biggest traditional media company is a trade up for the NFL.
Read more here…
|
|
|
…and Lauren on those Eva Chen/Vogue murmurs…
|
|
|
| Lauren Sherman
|
|
- Seems like
Anna Wintour may have larger ambitions for the U.S. Vogue head of editorial content position than many in the industry inferred. I’m told by multiple sources that Eva Chen, a Wintour protégé and Meta’s current head of fashion partnerships, has emerged as a leading candidate. To be clear, Wintour is still looking for names, and folks are currently submitting proposals. But if someone like Chen is actually in the
running, and seriously considering taking the job—or even considering it at all—that changes the game. Among other things, it would suggest that whoever lands the role may be in line to succeed Wintour in the big chair.
After all, there are approximately three people in the entire world who could plausibly one day replace Wintour: Chen, the most qualified; Sara Moonves, editor-in-chief and owner of W, a close second; and… I
can’t think of a third. (Chloe Malle has many of the hallmarks, but her appointment in the larger Wintoursphere currently requires some magical thinking.) Anyway, I’ve always pegged Chen as Wintour’s successor as Met Gala chair and lead fundraiser, partly because I didn’t think Vogue would ever be able to match her Meta comp—particularly her equity incentives in the A.I. economy—and I’m standing by that assumption. But I’m sure that’s a hard, and not inconsequential,
conversation to have with a mentor.
Wintour, however, is nothing if not determined, and wooing Chen back to Condé Nast would be an incredible coup that would offer advertisers a tremendous amount of reassurance. Chen works directly with all the top luxury brands on their social media strategies—and, remember, she’s not pitching them anything. The brands need Chen and Meta more than she needs them, and that’s a posture that Condé Nast must regain, or at least pretend
to.
For Chen, the only reasons to do this would be her loyalty to Wintour, and because it’s Vogue—which, to a person like Chen, who grew up at Condé Nast, and exited before things got really dire, still matters. She’s definitely not going to make more money. She would be charged with managing a shrinking business and answering to someone who has indicated no plans to exit the building any time soon. And yet…
As for other candidates, I’m sure you’ve heard about the
Polymarket betting poll, first noted in Feed Me. I love whoever wrote this poll. They included several viable options—Moonves, Malle, Chioma Nnadi—but also Kate Betts, who famously sank Harper’s Bazaar at the beginning of the 2000s (I stand by my admiration for her Bazaar.) Maybe the author is
Vogue deputy editor Taylor Antrim, who would have heard of Betts, and is also never getting this job, but is somehow listed on this ranking? Anyway, it’s funny.
|
|
|
While the media universe overanalyzes the free speech implications of
the tediously drawn out Paramount-Skydance merger—the Colbert-Carr-‘South Park’ of it all—CBS rank and file are pondering a simpler question: Who’s gonna fix the evening news?
|
|
|
On Thursday afternoon, F.C.C. chairman Brendan Carr and fellow
commissioner Olivia Trusty voted to approve the $8 billion merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media, bringing an end to more than 250 days of regulatory review and political pressure on both mediacos, and thus greenlighting Shari Redstone’s hard-fought $2.4 billion exit and David Ellison’s inheritance of a century-old studio, the NFL’s AFC rights, and a once-storied television business now rendered a political piñata. The whole
saga would make for a great HBO miniseries, if not for the fact that it kind of already did, and the depressing reality that the stakes have suddenly begun to feel so low.
Indeed, Shari’s late father, Sumner, never would have imagined off-loading his empire for so little. The $30 billion combination of CBS Corp. and Viacom, in 2019, already represented a significant discount from their previous valuations. And one wonders whether Larry
Ellison, with a net worth of $280 billion, would have suffered his own role as bankroller and Oval Office whisperer if anyone but his own son wanted the asset.
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
TASTEMAKER’S CHOICE The Range Rover is a serene, elegant expression of modern luxury. EXPLORE
|
|
|
In any event, the F.C.C. order has been given, and the deal is slated to close on
August 7—despite newly minted billionaires Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s best attempt to nuke all of Shari and David’s efforts at the eleventh hour. On the political front, the F.C.C.’s decision to grant approval only after Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a meritless lawsuit against CBS over the editing of a
Kamala Harris interview is, ahem, noteworthy. Some business leaders now fear a regulatory environment where approval comes with the additional closing cost of a Trump tax. (Of course, as Bob Iger learned, you can pay a Trump tax even when you don’t need regulatory approval. Although the Fubo deal was announced shortly thereafter…) As I
noted earlier this week, the real intrigue of Trump’s latest lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal is that Rupert Murdoch may prove to be the rare media mogul with the leverage and fortitude to actually stand up to the president.
On the business front, David Ellison and his deputies—incoming president
Jeff Shell, and CBS C.E.O. George Cheeks, who will stay at the company—will now implement a plan they’ve had ample time to draft. As my partner Matt Belloni has reported, this will likely start with layoffs intended to help reach the promised $2 billion in cost savings, as well as a very au courant sale, or
spinoff, of the cable networks, and a reduced investment in scripted programs. Paramount+ and Pluto TV could also merge, yielding more savings.
Then, of course, there is CBS News, the political football in this whole dispiriting drama. Paramount’s decision to settle the 60 Minutes lawsuit was obviously discouraging for the news veterans. So, too, was Shari’s meddling in the once sacrosanct editorial process, as well as the forced resignation of 60 Minutes executive
producer, Bill Owens. Now, CBS journalists worry about their own new administration, which didn’t hesitate to put their biggest late-night star out to pasture when his math broke the pencil; and has pledged to scrap D.E.I. programs and hire an ombudsman to monitor “bias” (read: liberal bias); and, according to Trump, committed to $20 million in advertising and public service announcements for causes near and dear to the president’s heart.
But, as one
insider put it, “the big question is Bari [Weiss]. Does she come in and shake things up?” As I’ve noted, David’s pursuit of Weiss’s Free Press feels like a passion play, a chance to virtue signal and tack CBS News toward something less overtly liberal. Indeed, it would certainly be slightly ridiculous to reshape a national multigenerational newsbrand through the ethos of a 40-something provocateur, especially one whose chief talent is playing herself.
|
At the same time, I suppose, the hire would at least have the virtue of being
interesting. Staid institutions like CBS News play a meaningful role in preserving this whole democratic project, of course, but their myopia has also played a role in their own diminished influence, and helped fuel the market for companies exactly like The Free Press. That said, paying the $200+ million ransom that was floated in the Financial Times sure would seem rich.
All that said, the anxiety surrounding this deal—and the public narrative spurred on by
Colbert, Jon Stewart, and South Park—may mask a deeper, evergreen anxiety inside the halls of CBS News. When I asked insiders how they were feeling in the wake of the F.C.C. news, most seemed far more concerned with what the new regime would do to buoy the network’s diminishing ratings. “All the outside commotion hasn’t caused much, if any, internal commotion,” one insider said. “It’s still a last-place network. No one watches evening news. No one
watches the morning show…”
Indeed, the Colbert–South Park dichotomy is illustrative here. While many suspect that Colbert was a sacrificial lamb for the deal, it’s also true that he was costing the company around $40 million a year. South Park, by contrast, was so valuable to Paramount’s leaders that they were willing to approve $1.5 billion to let Trey and Matt torch both them and Trump on Comedy Central’s air. What scares many CBS News insiders most
about Colbert’s cancellation isn’t censorship, but the ominous signal of the cuts yet to come, especially as Evening News hovers below 4 million viewers a night, and Gayle King–level talent salaries can no longer be justified.
In the meantime, CBS News insiders are finding solace in stabilizing forces: Tom Cibrowski, who has shored up news-gathering with the help of some old ABC News hands, and Tanya Simon, who this week was
promoted to executive producer of 60 Minutes, which pleased most old-timers even if it reeked of nepotism to some (her father, Bob, was a legend in the building). Meanwhile, Ellison is still in talks to bring CBS News veteran David Rhodes back to run the news division. But one assumes a significant part of his job will be to do the dirty work for the new owners. Those $2 billion in synergies don’t cut themselves.
|
|
|
Join Emmy Award-winning journalist Peter Hamby, along with the team of expert journalists at Puck, as they let you
in on the conversations insiders are having across the four corners of power in America: Wall Street, Washington, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood. Presented in partnership with Audacy, new episodes publish daily, Monday through Friday.
|
|
|
A professional-grade rundown on the business of sports from John Ourand, the industry’s preeminent journalist,
covering the leagues, players, agencies, media deals, and the egos fueling it all.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news. You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with {{customer.email}}. To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|