Greetings from Las Vegas, and welcome back to In the Room. In tonight’s issue, news and notes on Brendan Carr’s latest Comcast threat and the fallout from his ongoing intimidation campaign against the news media.
🍸 Plus, on the latest edition of The Grill Room, Julia Alexander returns for another deep dive into the media industry’s most compelling flashpoints: Formula One’s fantasy of a $180 million U.S. rights deal, streaming subscriber stagnation, Mark Zuckerberg’s F.T.C. showdown, and more. Follow The Grill Room on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you prefer to listen.
Also mentioned in this issue: Jeff Bezos, Bob Iger, Brian Roberts, David Zaslav, David Ellison, Shari Redstone, Steven Cheung, Sewell Chan, Wendy McMahon, and many more…
Let’s get started…
|
- Alphabet in the soup: As you know, a U.S. District Judge has ruled that Google oversees an illegal advertising monopoly—a landmark decision that could force the tech giant to unwind parts of its ad business and change the structure of the internet itself. As Julia noted, last year’s ruling against Google effectively condemned its monopoly on how people use the web, while this one condemns its monopoly on how people make money on it—all of which could have major ramifications for media businesses and their monetization strategies. We’ll be following along…
- So long, Sewell: Sewell Chan, the veteran newspaperman and serial media conference panelist, has been fired from his job as executive editor of the Columbia Journalism Review after staff complaints about what sources described as a hostile management style. Columbia Journalism dean Jelani Cobb announced his termination Friday, thanking the staff for their “resilience and dedication.” Chan criticized the move as “hasty, ill-considered and, quite frankly, baffling”—though, for what it’s worth, none of the folks I’ve spoken to who have worked with him (at the Los Angeles Times or The New York Times) seem terribly surprised. “He’s a really stressful manager,” said one. Or, as another put it: “Yeah, he’s a lot.” You can read Chan’s full statement, and personal account of the incidents precipitating his firing, here.
|
|
|
|
News and notes on F.C.C. chairman Brendan Carr’s legacy media blitzkrieg and the many meanings of “public interest.”
|
|
|
|
In his first 100 or so days as F.C.C chairman, Brendan Carr is proving to be as fast and pugnacious as anyone in the Trump administration, and that’s no small feat. Carr has already tormented legacy media, and ostensibly devoured the media attention that attends his scalp-hunting. Since assuming control of the F.C.C., Carr has launched investigations into both Comcast’s NBCUniversal and Disney’s ABC over their D.E.I. initiatives; into PBS and NPR over their airing of commercial advertisements; and into a San Francisco–based radio station for revealing the locations of undercover ICE agents. Most notably, he demanded that CBS turn over the raw footage of their 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, suggesting that their fairly benign alternate editings of the tape could be relevant to whether or not the F.C.C. grants approval of David Ellison’s $8 billion Skydance-Paramount merger.
On Wednesday, in his latest calculated fit of pique, Carr took aim at Comcast once again—this time, however, it was over MSNBC’s coverage of the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Maryland man who was whisked away to a maximum security prison in El Salvador last month without trial or due process. In the view of many federal judges, Garcia’s deportation was “lawless” and “unconscionable,” and the Supreme Court was unanimous in its declaration that the White House should “facilitate” his return. Garcia’s attorneys argue that their client is a caring father and family man, while the Trump administration contends that he’s a dangerous criminal and gang member—exactly the sort of factual dispute that could be resolved by, you know… due process. But I’ll leave that to the justices.
|
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
TASTEMAKER’S CHOICE
The Range Rover is a serene, elegant expression of modern luxury.
EXPLORE
|
|
|
In any event, Carr saw the Garcia debate as leverage in his ongoing campaign against the legacy news media—just as Trump has used the issue to shift the national conversation back to immigration, which, as my partner Peter Hamby has noted, remains political terra firma for him amid the tariff aftershocks. On X, the loquacious White House communications director Steven Cheung said it was “SHAMEFUL” that CNN and MSNBC weren’t covering a briefing room appearance by a Maryland mom whose daughter had been murdered by a different Salvadoran immigrant. Carr shared Cheung’s post, but instead used it to target MSNBC’s parentco over the Garcia matter.
In his own social post, Carr alleged that “Comcast outlets” had “spent days misleading the American public” about Garcia by implying that he was “merely a law abiding U.S. citizen, just a regular ‘Maryland man,’” rather than a “validated member” of “a transnational criminal organization.” Carr then seemed to hint at possible retribution: “Comcast knows that federal law requires its licensed operations to serve the public interest. News distortion doesn’t cut it. … Why does Comcast ignore these facts of obvious public interest?”
|
To debate the merits of these investigations is to miss the point, obviously. Carr is using his regulatory authority—or abusing it, according to many lawmakers and First Amendment advocates—to try to influence the news media’s coverage, just as Trump hoped that excommunicating the Associated Press over maritime nomenclature might force other news outlets to be more cautious with their own editorial posture. Is it working?
Historically, American media institutions have enjoyed ample leeway to exercise their own editorial judgment regarding current affairs and even
occasionally get things wrong without fear of retribution—a sacred pact that, according to many scholars, legal experts, and founding fathers, sort of allows this whole “free and democratic society” show to roll on. Through seemingly arbitrary channels—D.E.I. initiatives, advertising arrangements, public interest requirements, and so on—Carr has sought to impose some checks. And lest you need further evidence of the play here, Carr has leveled no threats against the Murdochs over Fox News’s downplaying of myriad matters of public interest, including a Capitol insurrection, various presidential indictments, and the outbreak of a global pandemic, to name a few.
Officially, virtually every media company maintains that its scrutiny of the Trump administration has been undeterred by these threats—and, to be sure, any perusal of the major non-Fox news outlets on television or online yields ample critical coverage. Inside these news organizations, however, many executives, producers, editors, and journalists speak to an undeniable chill factor that manifests itself in a far more cautious approach to everything from story pitches to narrative framing to headlines. ( Peter Baker, the New York Times chief White House correspondent and Beltway eminence, discussed this with me at length on The Grill Room last month.)
|
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
TASTEMAKER’S CHOICE
The Range Rover is a serene, elegant expression of modern luxury.
EXPLORE
|
|
|
Ever since Bob Iger agreed to pay $16 million to settle Trump’s lawsuit over George Stephanopoulos’s errant use of “rape” to describe what was legally deemed “sexual abuse,” the general sense I get from the anchors, correspondents, journalists, and even opinion writers is that no one wants to be responsible for their boss having to cough up tens of millions for the next settlement—or legal fees, if any of these folks ever grow some actual stones. Indeed, this is all in keeping with the terms of engagement that Jeff Bezos modeled when Amazon shelled out $40 million for Brett Ratner’s masterpiece on Melania, which became the precedent for the Don Jr. Duck Dynasty spinoff that an administration type reportedly soft-pitched to WBD emissaries—a detail that landed in Michael Wolff’s copy this week.
In Comcast’s case, Brian Roberts is about to sever ties with MSNBC by spinning off his cable assets into SpinCo—a play to free his business from the linear albatross that has the added benefit of reducing his exposure to the headaches that come from owning an overtly partisan cable network ( Six percent of my business and 90 percent of my problems, as the saying goes). Needless to say, the divorce papers can’t get filed soon enough. Meanwhile, David Zaslav will probably spin off CNN along with the rest of his cable assets—an eventuality that he has prepared for via the recent restructuring of Warner Bros. Discovery. As CNBC’s Alex Sherman reported Friday, Zaz still has his bankers working that option.
The more illustrative example of Trump administration pressure here is the Paramount-Skydance merger. In recent months, I’ve reported on the myriad controversies at CBS News—from the mishandled Tony Dokoupil–Ta-Nehisi Coates contretemps to the controversial 60 Minutes segment on Gaza—and both Paramount’s Shari Redstone and Skydance’s David Ellison plainly obvious frustration with CBS News C.E.O. Wendy McMahon. Indisputably, McMahon deserves scrutiny for mishandling those matters, as well as for her ill-advised overhaul of Evening News, which is now drawing less than 4 million viewers despite recent assurances from executive producer Guy Campanile that such a plunge would never happen. At the same time, it’s impossible to ignore the fact that the heat she’s enduring is coming from two dealmakers who are extremely eager to get F.C.C. approval on a merger, and really wish she’d stop giving Trump and Carr reasons to equivocate on, or even block, that deal. Of course, Shari has already signaled her willingness to settle Trump’s lawsuit over the Kamala interview, and the two sides have hired a mediator to help determine the terms. One can only wonder what her current partner, the Pulitzer-winning journalist Paul Goldberger, makes of this concession.
Last Sunday, Trump once again attacked 60 Minutes after the news magazine ran stories about the war in Ukraine and his proposed takeover of Greenland. “Almost every week, 60 Minutes ... mentions the name ‘TRUMP’ in a derogatory and defamatory way, but this Weekend’s ‘BROADCAST’ tops them all,” he wrote on Truth Social, before calling on Carr to impose maximum fines and punishment “for their unlawful and illegal behavior.”
In another era, the owner of CBS News might have felt compelled to stand up to the president on behalf of its journalists and remind the public that there is nothing unlawful or illegal about reporting on the president. It can be hard, however, to summon such fortitude in the heat of a deal. On Wednesday evening, McMahon and some of her CBS News colleagues, including Scott Pelley, attended a Broadway performance of George Clooney’s Good Night, and Good Luck, portraying the era when CBS’s Edward R. Murrow stood up to Joe McCarthy. Presumably, the show was more to her liking.
|
|
|
|
Join Emmy Award-winning journalist Peter Hamby, along with the team of expert journalists at Puck, as they let you in on the conversations insiders are having across the four corners of power in America: Wall Street, Washington, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood. Presented in partnership with Audacy, new episodes publish daily, Monday through Friday.
|
|
|
|
A professional-grade rundown on the business of sports from John Ourand, the industry’s preeminent journalist, covering the leagues, players, agencies, media deals, and the egos fueling it all.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with . To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|