Hi, and welcome back to Line Sheet. When was the last time you bought a product from Estée Lauder?
Can’t remember? Same. And yet, as Sarah Shapiro noted last week, the brand that started it all remains one of the most widely distributed, and bestselling, skincare lines across the globe. What gives?
In today’s dispatch, Puck beauty queen Rachel “ Rachel@puck.news” Strugatz explains how Estée’s 20-plus-year struggle for relevance has chipped away at the conglomerate’s profits. She takes stock of the rest of the portfolio, too, from Tom Ford to Clinique, sharing what’s happening behind the scenes as C.E.O. Stéphane de La Faverie’s turnaround plan begins to take shape.
Up top, Rachel also explains what in the world is going on with a newly acquisitive Violet Grey, and
Dry Powder’s
Bill Cohan is back with the requisite Saks Global update.
For those of you with the Shoppies: While we’re on the subject of skincare, I should tell you that my skin has become very dry since I moved to Los Angeles five years ago. Blame the aridity, the hard water, my age, using P50 1970 and nothing else for over a decade, or all of the above. I had resigned myself to sandpaper cheeks when my facialist in New York, Lara Kaiser
at Carrie Lindsey Studios, suggested Monastery’s Rose cleansing oil. I’ve been using it for more than six months, and I swear it restored my skin barrier (or whatever). Recently, Friend of Line Sheet Marisa Meltzer
recommended Monastery’s Flora botanical cream serum, which I’m using as my moisturizer. My cheeks feel normal again. Have I de-aged?
Mentioned in this issue: Haider Ackermann, Tom Ford, Tilda Swinton, Kate Moss,
Stéphane de La Faverie, MAC Cosmetics, Le Labo, Sephora, Ulta, Estée Lauder, Matthew Parr, Violet Grey, Saks Global, and many, many more…
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
The end of De Minimis has already redefined global commerce - and most businesses aren’t navigating it alone. A recent Swap study found
88% of companies are already seeking partners to adapt cross-border strategy, mitigate tariff exposure, and protect profitability.
Swap’s latest tariff turmoil report gives leaders the playbook to stay compliant, defend margins, and unlock global growth in the new trade era.
👉
Download the full report
|
|
|
Two Things You Should Know…
|
|
|
 |
Rachel Strugatz |
|
- Violet Grey M&A: Violet
Grey made headlines last week for acquiring The Detox Market, a clean beauty marketplace with locations in L.A. and New York. But the real news is that Violet Grey is also buying Cos Bar, perhaps the highest of the high-end beauty retailers, which I always thought should have a larger footprint.The merger makes a ton of sense for Violet Grey, which has far more influence than Cos Bar despite operating fewer doors. Cos Bar currently manages about 21 stores
across the U.S.—itself a far cry from when, following a majority investment from Tengram Capital Partners in late 2015, the company was on track to have 50 stores by 2021. Insiders tell me that the deal, which has been in diligence for months, is definitely happening and should have been announced already. Although, as always, anything can happen.
|
|
|
 |
William D. Cohan |
|
- Saks in stealth mode:
Our friends at Saks Global appear to be facing yet another financial hurdle in their ongoing effort to avoid the “B” word—bankruptcy. You’ll recall that last month, the company executed a highly successful LME, or liability management exercise: Wall Street’s latest poker-faced euphemism for a badly needed financial restructuring. The LME bought Saks Global some time, while carving up its original $2.2 billion bond into different priorities, and generating up to $600 million of new
financing.That left Saks Global to resolve an outstanding $599 million commercial mortgage-backed security, secured by a joint venture with the Simon Property Group, which owns 10 Saks stores and 20 defunct Lord & Taylor locations, by August. Saks Global owns 62.4 percent of the joint venture. But back in May, as I noted, Debtwire reported that the real
estate assets in the J.V. had been valued at $525 million, 53 percent below the 2019 appraised value. Assuming a lender would provide the J.V. with 60 percent of the appraised value, a new loan of $315 million would leave a hole of $284 million. Saks Global would have to cough up 62.4 percent of that sum, or some $177 million, in order to repay the outstanding $599 million—just when the company could least afford it.
Now that it’s September, I was curious whether Saks had been
able to refinance the $599 million CMBS. I got a fuzzy answer. Saks Global spokesperson Nicole Schoenberg sent a statement that HBS Global Properties, a development company, had “entered into a letter of understanding” to refinance the CMBS and “secured” an extension beyond the original August deadline. HBS, the statement read, was “seeking a new lender aligned with the current strategy” and, as a result of asset sales and debt amortization, the amount to be refinanced is closer
to $550 million, not $600 million. (That would make Saks’s true-up check closer to $150 million, rather than $177 million.)
Schoenberg wouldn’t disclose the name of the entity that HBS was soliciting for the new financing, but Bloomberg’s Eliza Ronalds-Hannon and Scott Carpenter reported last week that the CMBS loan was turned over to “a workout specialist” in July because it was “approaching an imminent maturity default.” The loan servicer granted HBS a
60-day extension to refinance the loan, according to Bloomberg, after HBS provided the term sheet from the new, unnamed lending source to the old lending source.
A “workout specialist”? Hmmm. Why Saks Global is so cagey with information, I’ll never know. I’m sure the management team thinks less is more, but the lack of transparency with the market about the extent of its ongoing financial difficulties will not redound to its benefit in the end. But I guess Marc
Metrick, the Saks Global C.E.O., will need to discover that for himself.
|
|
|
Thanks, Bill. Now back to Rachel…
|
|
|
Estée Lauder’s nearly 80-year-old flagship brand showed some signs of life with a strong quarter. Great. But the fate of Stéphane de La Faverie’s corporate turnaround will require that the parent company’s other 24 brands actually lead the way.
|
|
|
Last week at the Venice Film Festival, Tom Ford creative director Haider Ackermann gathered
some of his famous friends at a 16th century palace to fete Black Orchid Reserve, a more highly concentrated version of the brand’s hero scent but rendered with ghost orchid. Tilda Swinton, the star of the fragrance’s new campaign, was serendipitously in Venice for the premiere of Broken English. And she joined Ackermann’s crew for a campaign reveal, intimate dinner, and impromptu photo shoot that was art directed by Kate Moss.
In some
ways, the launch almost felt like a celebration of a new era at The Estée Lauder Companies, which has spent the last few years bedeviled by a rolling series of headaches—a very public C.E.O. succession process, tumultuous family dynamics, and tumbling stock prices. Indeed, nearly a year after Stéphane de La Faverie took over as C.E.O., the world’s largest family-controlled beauty company is
showing signs of a rebound. Sure, net sales are still down, but the stock price is up more than 20 percent year to date, and there have been gains in a handful of markets, including the U.S.
|
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSOR
|
The end of De Minimis has reset the rules of global trade. Every U.S.-bound shipment now faces tariffs, higher costs, and compliance
pressure—making margin protection more critical than ever.
Swap’s latest tariff turmoil report gives businesses the blueprint to adapt quickly, reduce risk, and turn disruption into growth.
Inside, you’ll learn:
🌍 Impact of the De Minimis suspension on global commerce
💸 How businesses and customers are adapting to rising costs
⚠️ Risks of inaction for margins and loyalty
🚀 Five strategies to protect profits and fuel growth
👉
Download the full report
|
|
|
Much of the post-transition housekeeping is also well underway: A new executive leadership team and org chart
have been implemented, and the elimination of “up to 7,000” employees is nearly complete—which, I’m told, has created a positive vibe shift among staff. De La Faverie has done his part to stabilize the P&L, but the rest of his turnaround hinges on the individual brands—many of which finally need to figure out how to communicate with customers and attract new ones in a multichannel world. Alas, the common characteristic across the E.L.C. portfolio is waning relevance, a contagion
that has trickled down from the top.
|
Of course, some of Lauder’s biggest beauty lines continue to appear in top rankings—they’ve been household
names since your grandmother first discovered them, and they still enjoy the widest prestige distribution in the world. And then there’s MAC Cosmetics, The Ordinary, Jo Malone, and Le Labo, among others, which continue to challenge industry norms and/or prove they can withstand the grueling brand churn of the social media era.
But other brands within the portfolio remain challenged: Origins, Bobbi Brown, Dr. Jart+, and Bumble & Bumble have seen either sales compress or market share slip.
Balmain never took off in the first place. (“There were a lot of good learnings from the initial launch,” said a person familiar with the brand and its strategy. “There’s also now a willingness to adjust the strategy, especially with pricing and distribution.”) Overall, the company continues to grapple with continued softness in Asia, challenges in the youth market, and the North America market, itself, where prestige is dominated by the specialty multibrand channels— i.e., Ulta
and Sephora—that E.L.C. has never quite managed to crack. Meanwhile, there’s increased pressure to keep up with the indie brands—Makeup by Mario, Westman Atelier, Jones Road, Summer Fridays, etcetera—that have broken through during the last decade.
After all, all prestige roads still lead through Sephora—and E.L.C.’s track record at the retailer in North America has been mixed at best. I previously reported that Bobbi Brown is seeing cuts all around at Sephora, from door count to
its in-store footprint, and last year, Tom Ford Beauty’s makeup business declined by almost 50 percent year to date. Even Too Faced, which was once a Sephora darling, has failed to garner attention in seasonal trend “stories” that newer and exclusive-to-Sephora brands receive. And Sephora no longer carries Smashbox, the maker of a once top-selling primer, which is basically a dead brand at this point.
|
Last week, I reported that Matthew Parr, senior vice president and global creative director
of Estée Lauder, was let go after nearly a decade in the role, which led some to speculate about a consolidation of creative leadership at the flagship brand. One insider wondered whether Lauder was preparing to “cluster” its creatives together instead of appointing a dedicated global creative at each brand—which seemed to be the whole point of the McKinsey-esque “Beauty Reimagined” strategy that de La Faverie rolled out this past February. “They’ve been talking about that forever,”
said a former E.L.C. executive.
|
|
|
I’m still trying to figure out why Estée Lauder hasn’t undergone a creative renaissance. By contrast, MAC,
Clinique—and to a lesser extent, La Mer—have all had at least one zeitgeist moment. “The Lauder brand has had so many failed attempts at reaching a younger consumer,” said a former E.L.C. executive who has worked with the Lauder brand. Some obvious, recent examples include the Ladurée collaboration, the “sleep advisor” partnership, and the Gen Z–targeted
“Nutritious” collection.
In its latest earnings report, E.L.C. highlighted the success of a new Estée Lauder Double Wear Concealer, which was ranked by Circana as the top prestige makeup product launch for the first half of 2025. Sarah Shapiro also recently noted that Estée Lauder landed in the top 10 beauty brands in Q2, according to
YipitData. But some of that success has owed to the sheer size and scale of their rollouts and potentially slanted data. (As many executives and founders will tell you with notable exasperation, Circana only tracks certain brands and excludes many of Sephora’s exclusive brands.) Anyway, the concealer is hardly evidence of a turnaround. “Matthew may have been wonderful, and he can navigate the Lauder brand and E.L.C.,” the former executive added, “but I don’t
think that we’ve seen anything that would reflect that the brand understands culture.”
And therein lies the point. This afternoon, I took a look at the complete list of E.L.C. brands on the company’s corporate website, and de La Faverie’s burden crystalized before me: Aramis, Glamglow, Dr. Jart+, Origins, Lab Series, Darphin, Aveda, Smashbox, and a couple of others are dead weight. De La Faverie needs to clean house—either by divesting or closing some of these lines
altogether—and get the company back in the M&A game for his turnaround to work. In many ways, his plan hasn’t even yet begun.
|
What We’re Reading…
and Looking At…
|
Many of you have asked for the backstory on Charles Porch, Instagram’s head of partnerships,
and why his and philanthropist Robert Denning’s Paris wedding weekend at Le Bristol (with the ceremony at the Musée Rodin) was so stacked with fashion people (Derek Blasberg, Aurora James, Sara Moonves, Jenna Lyons, Chanel’s Rebekah McCabe, Brett Heyman), fashion-in-Hollywood people (the Foster sisters, Jennifer Meyer… Harry
Styles), and investor types who are also fashion people (Amy Griffin, Nick Brown, Jen Rubio, Selby Drummond, Xander Ritz). Jessica and Jerry Seinfeld were also there because… the Hamptons?
Anyway, I mostly know Charles as Eva Chen’s boss, but he has a rich history as a very early Facebook employee and the best friend of
Erin Foster, who officiated. (They met when they were in their 20s working as assistants.) Everyone seemed to have a wonderful time—even Tom Bannister, Eva’s husband. [ Vogue, with some context from
Town & Country and Porch’s 2022 appearance on Erin and Sara’s podcast]
The Venice Film Festival continues, and I wish someone at A24 would send me a screener of Marc by Sofia. Until then, some
notes on the clothes. Did something happen to Jude Law? He looks amazing. Also, The Rock in
Prada is inspired. Also, Greta Lee is The Row. Sofia Coppola is Marc Jacobs. I am pretty close to
declaring Kaia Gerber in Givenchy as the winner, though. Sarah Burton’s assignment at the LVMH-owned house is clearly to make clothes that women want to wear—and, wow, do women want to wear this.
The LVMH Prize was awarded to the undeniably skilled Japanese
designer Soshi Otsuki, while Steve O Smith, who hand paints a lot of his work, took the Karl Lagerfeld Prize. Naturally, the most fun part was getting a peek at the designer judges. ( Phoebe Philo in all black, Nicolas Ghesquière in all white, Jonathan Anderson in a folksy denim shirt.) [ Vogue
India]
Sam Hine got an incredible first look at the Virgil Abloh Archive, some of which will be on display at an exhibition in Paris this fall.
[ GQ]
Elon
Musk’s eldest daughter looks great in Chanel. [ The Cut]
|
Until tomorrow,
Lauren
P.S.: We use affiliate links because we are a business. We may make
a couple bucks off them.
|
|
|
Puck fashion correspondent Lauren Sherman and a rotating cast of industry insiders take you deep behind the scenes of this
multitrillion-dollar biz, from creative director switcheroos to M&A drama, D.T.C. downfalls, and magazine mishaps. Fashion People is an extension of Line Sheet, Lauren’s private email for Puck, where she tracks what’s happening beyond the press releases in fashion, beauty, and media. New episodes publish every Tuesday and Friday.
|
|
|
Puck’s daily art market email, anchored by industry expert Marion Maneker, offers unparalleled access to the mega-auctions and
galleries, elite buyers and sellers, and the power players who run this opaque world. Wall Power also features Julie Brener Davich, a veteran of Christie’s and Sotheby’s, who provides unique insights into how the business really works.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with {{customer.email}}. To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|