• Washington
  • Wall Street
  • A.I.
  • Hollywood
  • Media
  • Fashion
  • Sports
  • Art
  • Join Puck Newsletters What is puck? Authors Podcasts Gift Puck Careers Events
  • Join Puck

    Directly Supporting Authors

    A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.

    Personalized Subscriptions

    Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.

    Stay in the Know

    Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.

  • What is puck? Newsletters Authors Podcasts Events Gift Puck Careers
Happy Wednesday from Puck, and thanks for reading Dry Powder, my biweekly email about what’s really happening on Wall Street.
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 
Dry Powder

Happy Wednesday from Puck, and thanks for reading Dry Powder, my biweekly email about what’s really happening on Wall Street.

As you know, I’ve spent the past weeks chronicling some of the people in finance and media who first saw the failure of FTX coming. (Part 1, in conversation with Anthony Scaramucci is here; Part 2, featuring former broker Laura Goldman, is here; and Part 3, with short-seller Marc Cohodes, is here.) For tonight’s installment, I sat down with James Block, the amateur financial sleuth who was one of the first to get his hands around Alameda Research’s balance sheet—and helped to bring to light Sam Bankman-Fried’s house of cards.

As always, keep the tips and feedback coming. Your responses to these private emails go directly to my inbox.

Bill

The S.B.F. Chronicles, Part 4: Alameda, We Have a Problem
The S.B.F. Chronicles, Part 4: Alameda, We Have a Problem
Among the first to sniff out the infamous balance sheet of Alameda Research, S.B.F.’s now defunct hedge fund, was a young doctor turned financial sleuth whose analysis helped facilitate FTX’s demise. This is the fourth in a series.
WILLIAM D. COHAN WILLIAM D. COHAN
In many ways, James Block couldn’t be more different from Sam Bankman-Fried, the 30-year-old M.I.T. and Jane Street Capital alumnus who nuked FTX in a couple years and ensured that the ashes were spread equally across the hallowed halls of Wall Street, Congress, and Silicon Valley before moping around his family’s home in Palo Alto. Block, who is also 30, is from Michigan. He has a degree in biology from Hillsdale College (in Hillsdale, Michigan) and has a M.D./Ph.D. from Wayne State University School of Medicine (Detroit). He is now a resident at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) with a focus on emergency psychiatry and bipolar disorder. He has a Substack presence and is known on Twitter by the handle @dirtybubblemedia, a play on the villainous Sponge Bob character and the fact, as Block told me in a recent conversation, that crypto is “a dirty bubble; it’s a bubble and it’s filled with fraud and just dirty shit going on.”

As everyone knows by now, after weeks of verbal diarrhea, S.B.F. was arrested in the Bahamas on December 12 and extradited to the United States before Christmas. He pleaded not guilty to the numerous fraud charges filed against him by the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. After pledging some $250 million of assets, he was released on bail to his parents’ home, where he continues to defy legal advice and has met with my friend and former colleague, Michael Lewis, and my friend and partner, Teddy Schleifer. His trial begins in October. (You can read Teddy’s fabulous piece from inside the brain and home of S.B.F. here.)

Meanwhile, in early November, Block got his hands on the now infamous one-page unaudited balance sheet that purported to show the assets and liabilities of Alameda Research, S.B.F.’s now defunct hedge fund that put to work (read: lost) many billions of dollars that he allegedly siphoned off from FTX’s many customers. Block received the information at about the same time as Coindesk, the cryptocurrency news site. Like Coindesk, Block knew pretty much immediately once he saw the document that, if it was close to accurate, then Alameda and FTX were built on a house of cards and would surely collapse. He had seen it all before, with Celsius Network, a multi-billion crypto lending firm with close ties to S.B.F. that had filed for bankruptcy last July after using its own spun-up crypto token to make it look like it had more assets than it actually did.

Once he saw the purported Alameda balance sheet, Block thought he recognized the same phenomenon going on at Alameda and FTX. It was stuffed full of spun-up crypto tokens, including FTT, FTX’s crypto token. “I knew that they were in very serious trouble if those financials were real,” Block explained. “Because none of that stuff was realizable, as we’ve obviously seen since. That’s how all these schemes work: they basically create a bunch of assets on paper that are totally fictitious, essentially. So pretty easy once you’ve delved into a few of these things. So it was easy. Once you’ve seen it at once, it’s easy to recognize it.”

On November 4, Block wrote a blog post asking the provocative, and at the time shocking, question: “Is Alameda Research Insolvent?” Few had genuinely contemplated that notion before Block, and almost no one had articulated it out loud. As a result, Block’s financial heroism has earned him a spot in this mini-series about early S.B.F. bullshit callers. Not bad for a biology major.

Block was incredulous. The Alameda balance sheet once again confirmed his “dirty shit” thesis after all. “S.B.F. has a reputation for being the smartest guy in the room,” Block wrote in his post. “The crypto billionaire controls both one of the largest crypto hedge funds, Alameda Research, and one of the largest crypto exchanges, FTX. He has appeared in the thick of multiple crypto company failures, bailing out crypto lender Blockfi and acquiring most of the assets of Voyager Digital after their respective failures. Some have even compared his role during the recent crypto rout to J.P. Morgan during the crisis of 1907. However, a recent leak”—of the Alameda balance sheet—“suggests that S.B.F.’s crypto empire rests on some questionable foundations.”

“Billions of Dollars Out of Thin Air”
After studying S.B.F.’s simple balance sheet, Block concluded that Alameda’s largest asset was its collection of FTT tokens issued by FTX, its affiliated company. “It’s almost as if S.B.F. found a way to hack the financial system, printing billions of dollars out of thin air against which he was able to borrow massive sums from unknown counterparties,” he wrote. “Almost as if he discovered a financial perpetual motion machine.”

He described Alameda and FTX as a “flywheel scheme,” similar to the one Celsius Network had created before its bankruptcy, wherein you create a bullshit crypto token, pump it up by making it illiquid and then convert it into an actual currency—dollars—and use the real money to convince investors to invest, to buy real estate, stadium naming rights, Lambos, etcetera. “FTT token is another stupid flywheel,” Block continued. Worse, he realized, the FTT tokens were utterly illiquid and the increase in their valuation was basically phony; any attempt to sell the FTT tokens into a market that barely wanted them would result in a death spiral.

“All this to say that Alameda will never be able to cash in a significant portion of FTT to pay back its debts,” he concluded. “There are few buyers, and the largest buyer appears to be the very company Alameda is most closely tied to. The reality of this situation is that the vast majority of the value Alameda accrues to FTT token is unrealizable, and the fair market value of their FTT in the event of large sales would rapidly approach $0.” (Block’s emphasis.)

In our interview, Block described what S.B.F. was doing with Alameda and FTX as a “cargo cult,” a phrase I had never heard before. Apparently, a “cargo cult” refers to the observed behavior of some indigenous, isolated societies that came to believe that certain rituals, such as building fake airports, could facilitate the arrival of mysterious people bringing desirable goods and advanced technologies. They associated one with the other, without fully understanding the concept of jets or airports. “It’s a real thing,” Block instructed. “Look it up. “It is a perfect analogy.”

FTX used its tokens, he said, to create a “facsimile of a real economy,” like a cargo cult. “Essentially, what they do,” Block told me, “is they make this token up, which is literally just a few 100 lines of code running on a blockchain. They sell some of them off to the public. They retain a lot more of them for themselves and give them to insiders. And the rest of them end up sitting on the company’s balance sheet… They take advantage of the fact that a relatively small number of the tokens are actually in circulation and then they’re able to kind of capitalize on that lack of liquidity to drive the price up on these markets.”

As the lack of liquidity of the tokens drives their price up, the S.B.F.s of the world then mark the tokens to the higher market value and tell potential investors that, in addition to being this newfangled, cutting edge ‘change-the-world’ kind of company, they also have a huge and valuable set of assets. “But basically, any test of liquidity destroys the token and that’s essentially what happens [to S.B.F.],” Block said.

Investors and customers fell for it in droves. But Block, given his background in psychiatry, had other views. S.B.F. was “probably one of the least charismatic Ponzi schemers in history,” Block said, “but maybe that’s what worked in his favor.” He continued: “It feeds into itself, like as you become more successful, the more likely people are to kind of give you the benefit of the doubt, and be less willing to challenge you. Crypto relies entirely on obfuscation, and it makes things seem more complex than they really are. A lot of the time when I try to explain this stuff to my friends or family who aren’t familiar with it, and they go, I don’t understand, maybe I’m not smart enough, my response is always, No, you’re smart enough. It’s just that dumb. It’s so dumb that you have to really think about it to understand that because it just doesn’t it doesn’t make any sense because it’s not sustainable and it’s not real.”

The Guillotine
After Block published his Substack about S.B.F. and Alameda, he started getting a fair amount of attention. A day or so later, a friend sent him a screenshot of Changpeng Zhao’s Twitter feed. C.Z., as he is known, is the founder of Binance, a rival crypto exchange to FTX. C.Z. had “liked” Block’s Substack post.

Block thought that was really weird. “Normally when I write these things that are very negative about crypto, everyone circles the wagons,” Block continued. “It’s always, We’ve got to be positive. We have to support the community. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. We’ve got to make sure that we don't do damage to the community and the reputation of all of us. So the fact that this guy, who runs the largest exchange in the world, is liking my post about his competitor being insolvent was interesting.” After that came C.Z.’s tweet about dumping his FTT tokens, starting the proverbial “run on the bank” at FTX and Alamada. By swapping C.Z.’s equity stake in FTX for FTT tokens, S.B.F. handed C.Z. “the guillotine and said, ‘Whenever you want to chop my head off, go for it,’” Block said.

The rest, as they say, is history. The combination of the leaked balance sheet, the articles by Coindesk, and, as I reported earlier, S.B.F.’s unwise fundraising mission in Saudi Arabia, seemed to create a vulnerability for S.B.F. that no Larry David commercial, stadium naming, Gisele event, or congressional hearing could undo. Block’s post, plus S.B.F.’s shit-talking about C.Z. on the fundraising tour, as The Mooch recounted to me, seemingly helped facilitate C.Z.’s now famous tweet, which was all the motivation anyone needed to want to try to take their money out of FTX and Alameda. A classic bank run, although no bank was actually involved.

Three days later, FTX and Alameda were in bankruptcy, not unlike the same three days it took Bear Stearns to go down the tubes, back in March 2008. The difference? Bear Stearns had a savior, in the Federal Reserve and JPMorgan Chase. FTX, Alameda and S.B.F. had no one or no thing to save them. Kaboom!

For his part, Block can’t quite get over all that happened in a few short days in November and his not-insignificant role in it. “I knew that they were in trouble, obviously, because I wrote the article,” Block told me. “But I had no clue that it was as bad as it was. I did not think that they would go down in like three days. That blows my mind. It blows my mind. The fact that they had so little of the money that they were supposed to have is insane. And I can't wait to find out what the heck they were doing with it all because it's a lot of money to have gone missing over the course of just a couple of years.”

I asked him if he ever anticipated that his question about Alameda’s solvency would help lead to the rather extraordinary series of events, resulting in S.B.F.s demise. “No clue,” he said. “I wrote about Celsius for months before it went down. And I mean, did I contribute a little bit to that? Yes, but it wasn't like this. No, I never thought I would be in this position of having maybe accidentally helped kill one of the biggest companies in the space. I mean, oops. But it happens, I guess. You know, you never know what's gonna happen when you put something out in the world, anything can happen.”

FOUR STORIES WE’RE TALKING ABOUT
Palo Alto’s Most Wanted
Palo Alto’s Most Wanted
Scenes from a surreal, often sad home visit with Sam Bankman-Fried.
TEDDY SCHLEIFER
The Hakeem Dream
The Hakeem Dream
He inherited Pelosi’s rolodex, now can he shake the money tree?
TARA PALMERI
McCarthy Chaos Agents
McCarthy Chaos Agents
With the Speaker on a MAGA leash, insiders worry a shutdown is “guaranteed.”
JULIA IOFFE
Amazon’s NFL Fallacy
Amazon’s NFL Fallacy
Deciphering the streaming data behind a potentially momentous un-bundling.
JULIA ALEXANDER
Puck
Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn

Need help? Review our FAQs page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.

Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 227 W 17th St New York, NY 10011.

SEE THE ARCHIVES

SHARE
Try Puck for free

Sign up today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, A.I., Hollywood, and more.

Already a member? Log In


  • Daily articles and breaking news
  • Personal emails directly from our authors
  • Gift subscriber-only stories to friends & family
  • Unlimited access to archives

  • Exclusive bonus days of select newsletters
  • Exclusive access to Puck merch
  • Early bird access to new editorial and product features
  • Invitations to private conference calls with Puck authors

Exclusive to Inner Circle only



Latest Articles from Wall Street

Geoffroy van Raemdonck
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Saks Financial Colonoscopy
Amid a torrent of bankruptcy filings, a blunt declaration by Saks Global’s newly appointed chief restructuring officer lays out precisely what went wrong and when, and who got screwed hardest—plus which risk-hungry investors are likely to call the shots moving forward. As it turns out, the company’s capital structure became “unsustainable” almost immediately after its $2.7 billion acquisition of Neiman Marcus Group in December 2024.
David Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Ellison Way of Parenting
David Ellison’s latest schemes to wrest Warner Bros. from Netflix have proved insufficient after his previous negotiating tactics ran up the price. Meanwhile, he’s losing the respect of the WBD guys across the table. But will his dad come to the rescue with another, say, $10 billion to bail him out?
Patrick Drahi
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
A History of Creditor-on-Creditor Violence
Wall Street invented the coercive liability management exercise, which allows companies to play their creditors against one another as they extract beneficial terms for themselves—a now-routinized tradition referred to as “creditor-on-creditor violence.” But now Apollo, Oaktree, BlackRock, and JPMorgan Chase are teaming up to put an end to this mess.


Larry Ellison, David Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Zaz–Ellison Dagger Contest
Warner Bros. Discovery’s most recent S.E.C. filing reveals the latest battle lines between the company and its hostile suitor. In particular, the document evinces a deep distrust of Paramount Skydance’s proposed deal financing, recasting the $108 billion all-cash offer as an $87 billion L.B.O. that could fall apart before closing.
David Zaslav
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
What Is Zaz TV Really Worth?
The battle for Warner Bros. Discovery is increasingly coming down to how Netflix and Paramount Skydance value the declining TV assets (and CNN) that David Zaslav is determined to separate from the Warners mothership. Versant, which just started trading on Nasdaq this week, may provide the answer.
greg abel
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Make Berkshire Hathaway Great Again?
Greg Abel, the handpicked successor to Warren Buffett, faces one of the most exalted and daunting jobs in finance: determining what to do with the staggering $358 billion bequeathed to him by the most legendary investor of his generation. Herewith, three proposals for what Abel should buy with all that cash.


David Ellison, Larry Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Zaz Is From Mars, the Ellisons Are From Venus
Murmurs from sources close to the Warner Bros. Discovery deal illuminate the latest machinations surrounding the Paramount-Netflix showdown—and where this thing is headed.


Get access to this story

Enter your email for a free preview of Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.

Verify your email and sign in by clicking the link we just sent.

Already a member? Log In


Start 14 Day Free Trial for Unlimited Access Instead →



Latest Articles from Wall Street

Larry Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
“Larry Didn’t Show Up, and David Got Ahead of His Skis”
Everything you wanted to know about the Warner Bros. Discovery board’s doubts with the Ellisons’ bid (but were afraid to ask) is revealed in its 14D-9 filing—a mother lode of alleged Paramount missteps, from squabbles over consent provisions and breakup fee reimbursements to junior lien debt and the financial capacity of the world’s fifth-richest man.
larry ellison david ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Ellison Irrevocable Trust Issues
Despite their numerous bids for all of WBD, a rift has opened between the principals at Paramount Skydance and the board and advisors of their target company—at least for now. Can money heal all wounds?
larry ellison david ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Ellisons at the Gates
Paramount has raised the stakes in its hostile bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, and may yet go higher. Now Netflix must decide how much it wants to venture into junk credit-rating territory, or play games with its stock, to secure the prize.


Larry Ellison, David Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Netflix’s $83B Math & The Ellison Hostile Meter
A talmudic reading of the mishegas following the $83 billion Netflix-WBD deal: Zaz’s personal economics; the likelihood that this turns hostile; the unusual consortium of banks underwriting the deal; the value of the Gunnar stub; regulatory open questions; the $5.8 billion breakup fee; and more.
Leon Black
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Epstein Monologues
The recently released, one-sided correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein and Leon Black illustrates a discourse between a hustler and a billionaire with too much money and too little time on his hands. So why couldn’t Black get rid of him sooner?
Mike Mayo
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Wall Street Enters the “Cockroach” Wars
The multitrillion-dollar growth of private credit is fueling an acrimonious debate on Wall Street over whether this surging shadow market is the future of finance or the seed corn of the next crisis. Is Rowan right? Or Dimon? Or Gundlach? As Mike Mayo put it, someone is wrong.


david zaslav
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Zaz the World Turns
News, notes, and palace intrigues from all sides of what might become the largest M&A deal of the year: the three-way tussle for David Zaslav’s Warner Bros. Discovery.
Get access to this story

Enter your email to get access to one article and free previews of our private emails from Puck authors and editors.

OR

Already a Member? Sign in



Latest Articles from Wall Street

wall street 1929
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Spirit of ’29
Financial history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does often rhyme. Amid a speculative frenzy, deregulation, trade wars, and a handful of megacaps propping up the markets, some of Wall Street’s brightest minds wonder whether 2026 might resemble 1929.
Marc Rowan
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Street Credit
A recent string of bankruptcies and defaults suggests some challenges in the seemingly indomitable private credit market. And yet, according to some O.G.s, things have never been better. Apollo’s Marc Rowan lays bare the risks and rewards.
David Ellison
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Ellisonology 101
In his first earnings call as C.E.O. of Paramount Skydance, David Ellison offered a masterclass in corporate optimism, promising “synergies” and artfully dodging questions about a possible Warner Bros. Discovery takeover. Alas, the time to act is here.


Michael Bloomberg
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
What Does Bloomberg Want for Bloomberg L.P.?
A modest proposal for how New York’s $100 billion man could bequeath his namesake, and its monumental profits in perpetuity.
Jim Chanos
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Mag Seven Itch
The market is notching record highs for the so-called Magnificent Seven—or should that be Mag 10?—but a subterranean counternarrative is forming as once-secure food and consumer staples crater, and cracks emerge in the $3 trillion private-credit boom.
Brian Roberts
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
The Brian Roberts–WBD Bull Case
A new analyst note highlights a heightened sense around Wall Street that Comcast co-C.E.O. Brian Roberts doesn’t merely want WBD, but also truly needs the company—and has a real shot at the asset.


Jamie Dimon
William D. Cohan • January 11, 2023
Jamie’s Castle in the Sky
Dimon’s $3 billion (or maybe as much as $5 billion, really) new headquarters is the physical embodiment of his fortress balance sheet and a metaphor for our fractional banking system. But the seeming permanence of its bronze facade shouldn’t fool old Wall Street hands, who know nothing is forever.


  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Careers
© 2026 Heat Media All rights reserved.
Create an account

Already a member? Log In

CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Google
CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Google
OR YOUR EMAIL

OR

Use Email & Password Instead

USE EMAIL & PASSWORD
Password strength:

OR

Use Another Sign-Up Method

Become a member

All of the insider knowledge from our top tier authors, in your inbox.

Create an account

Already a member? Log In

Verify your email!

You should receive a link to log in at .

I DID NOT RECEIVE A LINK

Didn't get an email? Check your spam folder and confirm the spelling of your email, and try again. If you continue to have trouble, reach out to fritz@puck.news.

CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Google
CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Google
CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Apple
CREATE AN ACCOUNT with Apple
OR USE EMAIL & PASSWORD
Password strength:

OR
Log In

Not a member yet? Sign up today

Log in with Google
Log in with Google
Log in with Apple
Log in with Apple
OR USE EMAIL & PASSWORD
Don't have a password or need to reset it?

OR
Verify Account

Verify your email!

You should receive a link to log in at .

I DID NOT RECEIVE A LINK

Didn't get an email? Check your spam folder and confirm the spelling of your email, and try again. If you continue to have trouble, reach out to fritz@puck.news.

YOUR EMAIL

Use a different sign in option instead

Member Exclusive

Get access to this story

Create a free account to preview Puck’s full offering, including exclusive articles, private emails from authors, and more.

Already a member? Sign in

Free article unlocked!

You are logged into a free account as unknown@example.com

ENJOY 1 FREE ARTICLE EACH MONTH

Subscribe today to join the inside conversation at the nexus of Wall Street, Washington, A.I., Hollywood, and more.

START 14-DAY FREE TRIAL

  • Daily articles and breaking news
  • Personal emails directly from our authors
  • Gift subscriber-only stories to friends & family
  • Unlimited access to archives
  • Bookmark articles to create a Reading List
  • Quarterly calls with industry experts from the power corners we cover