 |
 |
|
Welcome back to The Best & The Brightest, I’m Peter Hamby.
|
|
In tonight’s edition, I take a look at Donald Trump’s search for a running mate, which is beginning earlier than usual this cycle thanks to his dominance in the Republican primaries. A lot of Republican names are being thrown around for the V.P. slot, and the auditions are already underway. And Trump’s eventual pick will say a lot about how he sees his path to victory against Joe Biden.
But first, Abby Livingston has the latest dish from the Capitol…
|
|
A MESSAGE FROM INSTAGRAM
|
| |
 |
| More than 75% of parents want to approve the apps teens under 16 download.
According to a new poll from Morning Consult, more than 75% of parents agree: Teens under 16 shouldn’t be able to download apps from app stores without parental permission.1
Instagram wants to work with Congress to pass federal legislation that gets it done.
Learn more. |
|
|
| G.O.P. Borderlands & Mayorkas Backlash |
|
There’s an astonishing split-screen playing out over border security in this dysfunctional 118th Congress. Over the past year, the Senate has seemed to operate in an alternate universe, one in which the House Republican conference might choose—or even prefer—compromise over chaos. Now, possibly too late, the scales appear to be falling from their eyes. Here’s why the divide between chambers is so stark:
- In the Senate, the border negotiating trifecta of James Lankford, Chris Murphy, and Kyrsten Sinema represents an earnest throwback to an era when Congress took big swings and passed big bills. Over the weekend, Lankford made the Sunday show rounds; they’re all former House members familiar with how each chamber works; and they’re slow-rolling their deal in the hopes of gradually building enough support to get it to passage. But even in other, more stable eras, border security has long been a graveyard of legislative ambitions.
Moreover, the Senate is aiming to attach Ukraine funding to a border deal—with both issues nonstarters for the right wing in the House. And behind the scenes, the Senate Republican conference is as divided as it’s been in years.
- On the House side, Republicans are addressing border security this week by preparing to impeach U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Since House Republicans took control a year ago, incessant talk of impeaching Joe Biden and his top officials has diluted the gravity of the impeachment process: In its history, Congress has only impeached 21 times, mostly over bribes and other forms of corruption, and only once has the House impeached a Cabinet official, and that was almost 150 years ago. House Republicans are reaching for the heaviest cudgel they can wield against the Biden administration, but it will be a futile exercise—there are no signs that Mayorkas will be expelled based on the current Senate makeup.
- This is all happening in the run-up to the Feb. 13 special election to replace George Santos, where immigration will likely play an outsize role. In the past, immigration rarely surfaced as an issue outside Republican primary campaigns (especially in Long Island), but it will likely be the centerpiece of the G.O.P.’s case against the Democrats this fall.
Republicans are obviously encouraged by what they’re hearing about border security from their focus groups and surveys, and there’s a sense of optimism within the G.O.P. that they’ve finally found a way to counter Democrats’ powerful abortion messaging. But boy, Democrats seemed elated on Friday when Speaker Mike Johnson called the rumored Senate plan “dead on arrival.” In the Democrats’ reading, this is a major opening to hammer Republicans for their intransigence.
|
 |
| The Apprentice |
| The media chatter around Trump’s vice presidential search is rightly derided as an overhyped and silly guessing game—the product of bored reporters and TV people paying way too much attention to a closely held decision that probably won’t matter anyway. But here we go… |
|
|
|
| Like it or not, the “Veepstakes” are here. With the Republican nomination more or less in his grasp, Donald Trump and his advisers are already mulling over who to pick as his running mate—in January, almost a year before the election. Trump was even talking about it before the Iowa caucuses. “I mean, I know who it’s going to be,” he said during a Fox News town hall on January 10, without going into much detail. Trump gave Bret Baier some more color, in typical Trump circuitous and elliptical locution, a few weeks later in New Hampshire, suggesting he’s close to making up his mind. “The person that I think I like is a very good person, a pretty standard. I think people won’t be that surprised, but I would say there’s probably a 25 percent chance that would be that person.”
The chatter around the vice presidential search, obsessed over by the press every four years, is often derided as an overhyped and silly guessing game, the product of bored reporters and TV personalities paying way too much attention to a closely-held decision that ultimately won’t have very much influence on the outcome of the election anyway. Even Trump is downplaying the importance of a vice presidential pick, which suggests to me that he’ll ultimately select someone competent and boring—you know, the Mike Pence type. “It’s never really had that much of an effect on an election, which is an amazing thing, both election and primary,” Trump told Baier. “It’s never really had much of an effect. … It won’t have any impact at all.”
He’s mostly right. With the possible exception of Sarah Palin’s chaotic turn on John McCain’s ticket, running mates usually don’t have a measurable impact on elections. It’s something that generates rare consensus among political operatives and political scientists: The choice on the ballot is really just the one between the two nominees. At best, a good running mate does no harm. His or her job is to convey the nominee’s values, survive a single semi-important TV debate, help raise money, and maybe energize the party’s political base without offending too many swing voters in the process.
So, is that person Tim Scott? J.D. Vance? Kristi Noem? I’m at least convinced it’s not Nikki Haley or Ron DeSantis, two names that should be eliminated from the V.P. conversation. Sure, primary rivals in the past have gone on to mend fences as running mates—see Kamala Harris—but both DeSantis and Haley have failed the all-important loyalty test with Trump. DeSantis is a bargain-bin version of the Big Guy without the charisma—he doesn’t excite or appeal to any slice of the electorate that Trump doesn’t already own.
As for Haley, her negatives with core Republican voters have been climbing in recent months, and her ramped-up attacks on Trump since losing in New Hampshire have made her pretty much irredeemable in Mar-a-Lago. Over the weekend, after Haley sided with the jurors who awarded E. Jean Carroll $83 million in damages from her defamation lawsuit against the former president, Trump adviser Jason Miller tweeted that “Haley just torpedoed her political future. There is no point of return. Haley is politically finished for ’24, ’28, forever.” |
|
A MESSAGE FROM INSTAGRAM
|
| |
 |
| Parents should be able to decide which apps are right for their teens.
According to a new poll by Morning Consult conducted in November 2023, more than 75% of parents believe teens under 16 shouldn’t be able to download apps without parental permission.1
Instagram wants to work with Congress to pass federal legislation that gets it done.
Learn more. |
|
|
|
|
| The first-term Alabama senator isn’t well-known outside Washington and her home state, but it’s hard to find a Republican with something negative to say about the 41-year-old mother of two. She’s well liked in Mar-a-Lago and the U.S. Senate, and has worked most of her life in the professional ranks of Republican politics without being tarred as a RINO. She would be an inside player on Capitol Hill as Trump’s vice president. “Her personality is not to run toward cable news, or try to be a big social media person,” one Republican who has worked with Britt told me. “She likes to work behind the scenes, to get things done, to work toward solutions. That’s her personality.” Like Scott, she’s also proud of her Christian faith. She wears a cross around her neck and published a book last year, God Calls Us to Do Hard Things, a compendium of faith-based life lessons for young people.
Britt and Trump already have a relationship. Trump endorsed her in her 2022 Senate primary in Alabama, and Trump thinks it’s cool that she’s married to former NFL offensive lineman and Alabama Crimson Tide standout Wesley Britt. Britt, the thinking goes, could give suburbanites permission to vote for Trump, in the same way friendly dad Glenn Youngkin was able to win back some Biden voters in the Virginia suburbs during the 2021 governor’s race. And in an election starring two aging and disliked nominees with 100 percent Name ID, she could lend some excitement to the ticket as a fresh face. |
|
|
| If blind loyalty is all that matters to Trump, then Stefanik might be the pick. Clearly, Stefanik wants the job—maybe too much. Few Republicans have bent the knee more deeply than the 39-year-old congresswoman from upstate New York, a Harvard grad and former G.O.P. establishment golden child who has since attached herself to Trump like a remora. Like Britt, Stefanik could be trusted to navigate the byways of Capitol Hill and would be a capable fundraiser on the campaign trail. Unlike Britt, she’s a MAGA fire-breather who might turn off swing voters.
Stefanik’s recent interrogation of university presidents on the subject of antisemitism elevated her profile and scored her big points on the culture war right. Importantly, Trump just likes her. One vulnerability for Stefanik: Her change of heart on the January 6 Capitol Hill insurrection. She once called the violence “anti-American” and “tragic,” but has since defended the rioters as “hostages,” backing Trump at every turn. With the Biden campaign planning to make much of the campaign about protecting democracy, they’ll surely use her past statements against her. |
|
|
|
|
| The Florida congressman, a member of the Freedom Caucus, has only been in Washington for a few years, but he’s already a star in the MAGAverse. He’s young, Black, and media savvy. Like Scott, he’s the son of a single mother and has a compelling, up-from-nothing story.
Importantly, he was an early endorser of Trump’s reelection, a big early blow to the presidential campaign of his home state governor, DeSantis. He’s chummy in Mar-a-Lago and has repeatedly denied that Joe Biden is a legitimate president, which has endeared him to Trump. Just as Scott might, Donalds could help Trump pick off some Black voters in certain corners of the country. But he’s got a more combative and conspiratorial edge than Scott. The Republican base would love him. Swing voters? I have my doubts. |
|
|
| Vance’s name kept coming up in my conversations with Republicans, but honestly, I’m having a hard time figuring out why. Like Stefanik, he was once a Trump critic but later genuflected. He would represent the MAGA brand in full—he’s an isolationist, China-bashing, protectionist, “America First” Republican. He’s young, he’s a veteran, and the G.O.P. base would like him, but I’m not sure he gains Trump much with swing voters, if that’s one of their goals. If Trump picks Vance, it’s a sign he wants to go full MAGA on the stump. Vance would be a loyal and scowling attack dog for Trump. He would, for instance, have no qualms about savaging Kamala Harris in that V.P. debate.
One complexifier: Vance’s longtime financial patron Peter Thiel has been openly critical of Trump in recent years, and there’s no love lost between the two men these days. Trump might not want to give Thiel the satisfaction of picking Vance. Another issue: While Ohio’s governor would likely replace Vance in the Senate with a Republican placeholder, state law also calls for a special election to ultimately fill the seat. Ohio leans red these days, but it’s no guarantee that a Republican wins that race—especially with Trump in the White House, firing up Democratic voters once again. |
|
|
| The telegenic South Dakota governor has been a rising star in Republican politics for over a decade, dating back to her time in Congress during the Tea Party era. Frequent Fox News viewers know her from the avalanche of South Dakota tourism ads that have been airing on the network for years. Noem has unquestionable conservative star power, and I have a hunch Trump likes that she looks glamorous on television, which is no small thing.
Noem checks multiple boxes on the culture war front. Given her flyover country roots and her love of hunting, she’ll draw inevitable comparisons to Sarah Palin. But unlike Palin, Noem is a canny politician with Washington experience. She was a loud and early crusader against Covid restrictions and mask mandates. She has been a vocal opponent of trans rights and signed legislation restricting trans girls from participating in youth sports. Noem would bring a Yellowstone vibe—God, guns, freedom, Carhartt—to the G.O.P. ticket.
She’s also been a regular Trump surrogate on Fox and other conservative networks, scoring points in Trump world with her early attacks on DeSantis after he launched his rival presidential bid. Noem has just been around Trump and his team for years now, and is now a known and well-liked figure in his orbit. This pick wouldn’t be a surprise in my book. In reality, she’s probably been on Trump running mate shortlist since the day he left Washington in 2021. |
|
|
|
| FOUR STORIES WE’RE TALKING ABOUT |
 |
| The Jamie Switcheroo |
| JPMC’s executive shuffle, Paramount tea leaves, Elon’s stock rant. |
| WILLIAM D. COHAN |
|
 |
| Hit and Ronna |
| A close look at Trump’s R.N.C. arm twist. |
| TARA PALMERI |
|
 |
| Jon Stewart 2.0 |
| Observations on Stewart’s return to The Daily Show. |
| BARATUNDE THURSTON |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQs
page or contact
us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.
|
|
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with . To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 227 W 17th St New York, NY 10011.
|
|
|
|