Hi, and welcome back to Line Sheet. Today is the second edition of our great Inner Circle project.
Along with this members-only send, the Inner Circle gives you access to tons of other great stuff, including guarded intel from Marion Maneker and Julie Brener Davich’s private email on the art market, Wall Power. They send an Inner Circle-only note every Wednesday covering lots of folks from the fashion world, including my two number ones— Pinault and Arnault—whose already massive art collections are growing by the day. More on the Pinault Collection below and changes at the family office, Groupe Artémis. Meanwhile, Puck’s Inner Circle offerings will be expanding significantly this quarter.
Today, I have an update on the Lanvin Group, an interesting Kering real estate play, Alexandre Arnault’s Russia problem, and so much more. For the main event, I’m offering a real-time assessment of the early aftershocks in our industry resulting from the L.A. wildfires’ impact on Hollywood, particularly as awards season rolls around.
Speaking of which: if you’re looking for a novel way to help, my friend Jake Longstreth is selling a limited-edition run of one of his paintings, Paseo Colorado. The proceeds will be donated to GoFundMe accounts of artists who lost their homes, studios, or businesses in the Eaton fire. If you’re interested, message Jake or Pace Prints on Instagram.
🚨🚨 Programming note: Tomorrow on Fashion People, Brother Vellies designer Aurora James and I dig into what she’s doing about the fires through her charity, Fifteen Percent Pledge, and what fashion brands are doing, and can do, to help. (Listen here and here.) The profits from the Fifteen Percent Pledge Gala, occurring on the Paramount back lot on the evening of February 1, will go toward impacted Black-owned businesses in the region. Same for tickets to the 15th Street Block Party, a marketplace featuring Black-owned brands, which will be open all day on February 1 and 2… also at Paramount. (You can buy your tickets for the block party here.)
Mentioned in this issue: Peter Copping, Tiffany, Andy Lew, Eric Chan, Armani, Valentino, Alexandre Arnault, LVMH, Jean-Jacques Guiony, Balenciaga, Lanvin, Philippe Schaus, Moët Hennessy, Nicolas Ghesquière, Jonathan Anderson, Louis Vuitton, Matthieu Blazy, Chanel, Tilda Swinton, John Galliano, Dior, Virginie Viard, Calvin Klein, Maison Margiela, Celine, Greta Lee, and many, many more…
|
Three Things You Should Know…
|
- Yes, the Lanvin Group is still a public company: This morning, before the markets opened, the Fosun International-controlled, New York Stock Exchange-listed fashion collective announced that St. John Knits C.E.O. Andy Lew would be replacing Eric Chan in the top job. (New title is Executive President.) I hear he’ll be moving to Europe to oversee all the businesses, which include Wolford, Sergio Rossi, St. John, and, of course, Lanvin, where designer Peter Copping is set to show his debut collection on January 26.
Lew will be the group’s third leader in just more than a year. (At the end of 2023, Chan—a longtime exec on the business side of Fosun—replaced Joann Cheng, who originally put the portfolio of brands together and helped Fosun acquire Lanvin in 2018.) Expect more executive changes as Lew, a traditional American retail executive who spent years at Nordstrom, Zegna, and Brooks Brothers, gets settled. I’d infer that his mandate is to cut costs while somehow burnishing the brands with diminished resources. (Wolford C.E.O. Regis Rimbert was already ousted within a year of joining the business.)Copping’s debut at Lanvin will be a test for both the designer and his C.E.O., Siddhartha Shukla, who once again has a new boss. All that aside, it still baffles me that the company is publicly traded in the U.S. After a lukewarm debut in 2021, it quickly became a penny stock and is currently trading at around $1.70 per share.
- Kering’s real estate play: There’s been some industry speculation about why Kering is entering a joint venture with Ardian, giving the French private equity firm a 60 percent stake in three of its Paris real estate assets.But this is all pretty simple: the deal allows the Pinault family to free up cash. They’re earning €837 million in the transaction, and I hear that they’re looking to do something similar with the $963 million Fifth Avenue building they bought last year. (It’s a good deal; you still own 40 percent of an appreciating property and also have a lot of extra money lying around.) A rep for Kering had no comment on plans for the Fifth Avenue building.Meanwhile, over at the Pinault family office, my partner Marion Maneker reports in his Wall Power private email that Christie’s C.E.O. Guillaume Cerutti is transferring to Groupe Artémis to manage the Pinault Collection—the family’s art assemblage of 10,000 works from more than 400 artists. Cerutti will also be in charge of “implementing and overseeing a new organization for the artistic and cultural activities” within Artémis.Marion will have more on this soon, but yes, that second part is as nebulous as it sounds. What’s certain, according to the people with whom I spoke, is that managing the Pinault Collection (including managing its exhibition space/HQ, the Bourse de Commerce) is a giant deal, and Artémis’s “artistic and cultural activities” will end up being serious business.
- Alexandre Arnault’s first challenge at Moët Hennessy? Fix this Russia mess…: LVMH is getting flak for a report in La Lettre claiming the company is selling champagne in Russia, despite halting distribution in the country after Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. According to La Lettre, “Moët Hennessy formed a parallel sales network for Russia,” through which third-party distributors in the U.S. shipped champagne and other LVMH spirits to the country, with LVMH reaping the profit. In a statement to Reuters, an LVMH rep tried to explain the circumnavigation: “Distributors have export activities. It is therefore impossible for Moët Hennessy to control the final destination of a product marketed by a distributor,” adding that “Moët Hennessy and its partners scrupulously comply with the laws, rules, and international sanctions in force on products marketed wherever they operate.”
Okay, so hear me out. As someone who deals with LVMH a lot, I can attest that they can ignore journalists, blurt out “fake news,” or deny something that then happens a few weeks later. (To wit: In October 2024, a company spokesman said that Moët Hennessy C.E.O. Philippe Schaus wasn’t being replaced—until acknowledging in November that he was being replaced by LVMH C.F.O. Jean-Jacques Guiony and heir Alexandre Arnault.) That said, in this case, I find it plausible they weren’t aware of the distributor conundrum—or at least they knew better than to inquire about the bubbly’s final destination, or were powerless until it was too late to stop it.I’d also say it’s pretty easy for Arnault—who starts on February 1 and is definitely in charge of improving the image of Moët Hennessy brands among the youngs—to simply pin this on his predecessor and then renegotiate the agreements and declare an easy victory. Also, at this point, does anybody really care?
|
|
|
|
The industry is anxiously waiting for Hollywood’s A-list to RSVP to the upcoming shows in New York, Milan, Paris, and London—and those anxieties have only been amplified by the fires. “The big houses are worried,” one C-suite luxury executive told me. “We know the celebrity impact.”
|
|
|
|
On Tuesday morning, as the Santa Ana winds were still blowing in Los Angeles, the fashion world continued to hold its breath. The industry was waiting on Hollywood to signal whether or not any major talents would be headed to the menswear shows next week, or the couture shows the week after… not to mention the women’s ready-to-wear shows in February and March, which were already being negatively impacted by the Oscars falling this year on March 2, between Milan and Paris, forcing houses to stretch resources while staging the runway and front row and outfitting A-list stars on the red carpet. “The big houses are worried,” one C-suite luxury executive told me. “We know the celebrity impact.”
This person was articulating a refrain I’ve heard increasingly in the past few days. While the unspeakable devastation wrought by the wildfires on lives and property in L.A. will unfold over decades—likely costing tens of billions of dollars and playing out in unprecedented ways—one not entirely unpredictable challenge has already emerged within the fashion industry: the fires’ impact on the already scrambled shows. The disaster will almost certainly depress movie star attendance in Europe—a blow to the houses and designers who are increasingly reliant on big name talent as part of the ever-evolving fashion-celebrity symbiosis.
After all, the bigger the star in attendance, and the better (or more interesting) they look, the more social media chatter there tends to be around a show. And in an era when the runway is, first and foremost, a marketing platform, online conversation is a leading indicator of economic success. Even before the fires, there weren’t very many A-list talents booked for the upcoming runway season—a mix of bad timing, a weak designer slate, and conflicting priorities.
This year, in fact, the big event in Paris is not a couture show, but a Tiffany dinner on January 28. (Many stars are probably obligated to attend the dinner, given how many of them will be paid to wear Tiffany jewels on the red carpet this season, including at the Oscars.) When it comes to couture, the biggest draws this month are Schiaparelli, Armani, Valentino, and Balenciaga—plus Peter Copping’s ready-to-wear debut at Lanvin. While a big draw for industry insiders, these designers do not have the same talent budgets as Chanel (which will be a studio collection) or Dior (designed by a lame duck).
|
|
Yes, fashion and Hollywood are increasingly codependent: Fashion needs Hollywood to market its brands and products. Hollywood needs fashion, albeit to a lesser degree, to top off actors so they can afford to star in independent films that don’t pay them anything, or simply compensate for the changing economics in the new streaming industry. But as one entertainment insider said to me recently, “sometimes it’s a buyer’s market, and sometimes it’s a seller’s market.” Right now, Hollywood is in control.
While an actor attending a runway show can result in an incredible R.O.I. for a brand, the reverse isn’t necessarily true—as in, attending a runway show doesn’t help you win an Oscar. These days, the awards season has become its own industrial complex, stretching nearly half the calendar year. Guided by awards consultants, talent must fill their schedules with for-your-consideration events, appear on popular industry-insider podcasts, and maybe even pose for the cover of The Hollywood Reporter (no matter how bad the lighting).
Now that the fires are messing with an already crowded awards-show schedule (the Critics Choice Awards, for instance, have been postponed twice), it’s unlikely that most actors in the running—or their agents or managers—will prioritize a runway show, even if there’s some money involved. An Oscar would mean that, next season, they can ask for double—or triple—the fee. While some brands don’t pay anything, and some brands bake the appearances into larger endorsement contracts, designers have been known to pay an A-lister as much as $250,000 for a one-off front-row appearance—occasionally far more. (And that is, sometimes, on top of private jet transportation, hotel, and glam.)
Sure, a version of this dynamic would still be playing out even without the fires. Fashion’s current state of limbo has already been affecting A-list talent, starting with the options of what to wear to awards shows. There’s a reason Louis Vuitton dominated the Golden Globes, and it’s not just because they have a big budget. These days, they consistently make great red-carpet dresses, thanks to a V.I.P. team that appears to finally be in lockstep with womenswear designer Nicolas Ghesquière after years of tough-to-pull-off looks. (The fix: They started making more traditional gowns in sumptuous, often textural fabrics, keeping them special by lightly nodding to Ghesquière’s strong design signatures.)
Also, Ghesquière’s position at Louis Vuitton is solid. Dior may have a talent budget, but there are plenty of actresses who want to wait for Jonathan Anderson to arrive and build a relationship with him, or continue the relationship they had with him at Loewe. Same for Matthieu Blazy at Chanel. Not every actor can collaborate on the design of her own look, as Tilda Swinton did with Chanel at the Golden Globes. And while the studio’s designs have received a warmer reception than Virginie Viard’s most recent collections, it’s not the same. Givenchy, Celine, Calvin Klein, Maison Margiela—I’m sure I’m forgetting several—are in similar situations.
Brands that can pay will get a few placements, yes. But the real red carpet magic in recent years happened when a designer and his muse, like Anderson and Greta Lee, built up each other’s profiles. Given the fashion industry’s never-ending game of musical chairs, I wouldn’t be surprised to see actors baking clauses into their contracts with brands that give them an out if the creative director exits—or is unceremoniously fired, à la John Galliano from Dior in 2011.
And yet, it’s important to remember that, as my Hollywood friend said, it’s currently a seller’s market. In October, when Blazy and Anderson are going head to head, nearly every major actress will be vying for a seat at one of those shows… and better yet, a multiyear, multimillion-dollar contract with their maisons.
|
What I’m Reading… and Watching…
|
LVMH moved its Watch Week out of Los Angeles and to New York and Paris on account of the fires. It’s a bummer for the service providers who need the work. [ Grey Market]
Richemont “smashed” its 3Q expectations, with sales up in both the “fine jewelry” and “other” (read: Alaïa and Chloé) categories, according to Luca Solca. [ Just Read the Press Release]
I know I make a lot of jokes about Evan Kinori, but I do think his stuff is good. From January 24 to 26—the same time as Men’s Fashion Week in Paris—he’s hosting an exhibition at the Marin Headlands Center for the Arts, featuring a new clothing collection as well as a new line of furniture created with salvaged, “old growth” redwood. There will also be artwork on display curated by Rosa Park, the owner of Francis Gallery, and a selection of rare books from William Stout. If I weren’t already going to be away from home, I would head up to the Bay Area for this show, if only as an excuse to hike the Marin Headlands. The opening reception is January 24 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. [ RSVP Here]
Bernard Arnault is set to buy two more publications: the “liberal-but-pro-business” daily L’Opinion (sounds like Fast Company!) and a financial news site, L’Agefi. [ La Lettre]
Jameel Mohammed won the CFDA’s inaugural Jewelry Design Award, sponsored by Tiffany. (The prize was $50,000 and a year-long fellowship.) Fine jewelry is one of the most expensive businesses to build because of the cost of materials, which is why most independent jewelers are also independently wealthy. So, this is nice. [Inbox]
|
|
And finally… A lot of people have been asking me if they should watch Max’s The Pitt after I posted a still of Noah Wyle grimacing to my Instagram Stories. While a 24-style show about a Pittsburgh E.R. might not sound like a great escape, and Wyle might look better without a beard, I can do nothing but recommend it.
Until tomorrow,
Lauren
|
|
|
|
Finally, a media podcast about what’s actually happening in the media—not the oversanitized, legal-and-standards-approved version you read online. Join Dylan Byers, Puck’s veteran media reporter, as he sits down with TV personalities, moguls, pundits, and industry executives for raw, honest, sometimes salacious conversations about the business of media and its biggest egos. New episodes publish every Tuesday and Friday.
|
|
|
|
Puck’s daily art market email, anchored by industry expert Marion Maneker, offers unparalleled access to the mega-auctions and galleries, elite buyers and sellers, and the power players who run this opaque world. Wall Power also features Julie Davich, a veteran of Christie’s and Sotheby’s, who provides unique insights into how the business really works.
|
|
|
Need help? Review our FAQ page or contact us for assistance. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news.
You received this email because you signed up to receive emails from Puck, or as part of your Puck account associated with . To stop receiving this newsletter and/or manage all your email preferences, click here.
|
|
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC. 107 Greenwich St, New York, NY 10006
|
|
|
|